Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 10 , Pages 1259-1271 , November 2010

Variability in the word-reading performance of dyslexic readers: Effects of letter length, phoneme length and digraph presence

  • Eva Marinus

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Sydney, Australia.
  • ,
  • Peter F. de Jong

Received 28 September 2008 ,Revised 27 March 2009 ,Accepted 18 May 2009.

References 

  1. Adelman JS, Brown GDA. Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2007;14(3):455–459
  2. Adelman JS, Brown GDA, Quesada JF. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science. 2006;17(9):814–822
  3. Balota DA, Cortese MJ, Sergent-Marshall SD, Spieler DH. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2004;133(2):283–316
  4. Barca L, Burani C, Di Filippo G, Zoccolotti P. Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers: Where are the differences?. Brain and Language. 2006;98(3):347–351
  5. Bleichrodt ND, Drenth PJD, Zaal JN, Resing WCM. Revisie Amsterdamse Kinder Intelligentie Test [Revised Amsterdam Child Intelligence Test]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1987;
  6. Borgwaldt SR, Hellwig FM, de Groot AMB. Word-initial entropy in five languages. Written Language & Literacy. 2004;7(2):165–184
  7. Brus BT, Voeten MJM. Eén minuut test [One Minute Test]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1995;
  8. van den Bos KP, lutje Spelberg HC, Scheepstra AJM, de Vries J. De klepel vorm A en B: Verantwoording, handleiding. diagnostiek en behandeling (The klepel Form A and B: Rationale, Manual, Diagnostics, and Treatment), Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Berkhout; 1994;
  9. Coltheart M, Davelaar E, Jonasson JT, Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. In:  Dornic S editors. Attention and Performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1977;p. 535–555
  10. Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler JC. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review. 2001;108(1):204–256
  11. Ehri LC. Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In:  Gough PB,  Ehri LC,  Treiman R editor. Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992;p. 107–143
  12. Ehri LC. Grapheme–phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In:  Metsale JL,  Ehri LC editor. Word Recognition in Beginning Literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998;p. 3–40
  13. Elbro C. Literacy acquisition in Danish: A deep orthography in cross-linguistic light. In:  Joshi RM,  Aaron PG editor. Handbook of Orthography and Literacy. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005;p. 31–46
  14. di Filippo G, de Luca M, Judica A, Spinelli D, Zoccolotti P. Lexicality and stimulus length effects in Italian dyslexics: Role of the overadditivity effect. Child Neuropsychology. 2006;12(2):141–149
  15. Geurts HM, Grasman RPPP, Verte S, Oosterlaan J, Roeyers H, van Kammen SM, et al. Intra-individual variability in ADHD, autism spectrum disorders and Tourette’s syndrome. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(13):3030–3041
  16. Hoffman L, Rovine MJ. Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: Foundations and illustrative examples. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(1):101–117
  17. Hutzler F, Wimmer H. Eye movements of dyslexic children when reading in a regular orthography. Brain and Language. 2004;89(1):235–242
  18. Jackson NE, Coltheart M. Chapter 3: Dual-route theories of reading. In: Routes to Reading Success and Failure: Toward an Integrated Cognitive Psychology of Atypical Reading. Ann Arbor, MI: Sheridan Books; 2001;p. 39–70
  19. Kessler B, Treiman R, Mullennix J. Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language. 2002;47(1):145–171
  20. de Luca M, Borelli M, Judica A, Spinelli D, Zoccolotti P. Reading words and pseudowords: An eye movement study of developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language. 2002;80(3):617–626
  21. Maas CJM, Snijders TAB. The multilevel approach to repeated measures for complete and incomplete data. Quality and Quantity. 2003;37:71–89
  22. Marinus E, de Jong PF. The use of sublexical clusters in normal and dyslexic readers. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2008;12(3):253–280
  23. Martens VEG. Orthographic Knowledge in Children with and without Reading Difficulties. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 2006.
  24. Martens VEG, de Jong PF. The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children. Brain and Language. 2006;98(2):140–149
  25. Peereman R, Brand M, Rey A. Letter-by-letter processing in the phonological conversion of multiletter graphemes: Searching for sounds in printed pseudowords. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2006;13(1):38–44
  26. Perry C, Ziegler JC, Zorzi M. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review. 2007;114(2):273–315
  27. Quené H, van den Bergh H. On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication. 2004;43(1–2):103–121
  28. Rack JP, Snowling MJ, Olson RK. The nonword reading deficit in dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly. 1992;27(1):29–53
  29. Rasbash J, Steele F, Browne W, Prosser B. A User’s Guide to MLwiN Version 2.0. London: Institute of Education; 2004;
  30. Rastle K, Coltheart M. Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998;5(2):277–282
  31. Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J. Standard Progressive Matrices. London: H.K. Lewis & Co Ltd; 1986;
  32. Rey A, Jacobs AM, Schmidt-Weigand F, Ziegler JC. A phoneme effect in visual word recognition. Cognition. 1998;68(3):B71–B80
  33. Rey A, Ziegler JC, Jacobs AM. Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition. 2000;75(1):B1–B12
  34. Richter T. What is wrong with ANOVA and multiple regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models. Discourse Processes. 2006;41(3):221–250
  35. Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A. E-Prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.; 2002;
  36. Schrooten W, Vermeer A. Woorden in het basisonderwijs. 15.000 woorden aangeboden aan leerlingen [Words in Primary Education: 15.000 Words Presented to Students]. Tilburg, the Netherlands: TUP (Studies in meertaligheid 6); 1994;
  37. Seidenberg MS, McClelland JL. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 1989;96(4):523–568
  38. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publishers; 1999;
  39. Spinelli D, de Luca M, di Filippo G, Mancini M, Martelli M, Zoccolotti P. Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2005;27(2):217–235
  40. Vellutino FR, Fletcher JM, Snowling MJ, Scanlon DM. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2004;45(1):2–40
  41. Weekes BS. Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1997;50A(2):439–456
  42. Williams BR, Hultsch DF, Strauss EH, Hunter MA, Tannock R. Inconsistency in reaction time across the life span. Neuropsychology. 2005;19(1):88–96
  43. Ziegler JC, Castel C, Pech-Georgel C, George F, Alario FX, Perry C. Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition. 2008;107(1):151–178
  44. Ziegler JC, Perry C, Jacobs AM, Ma-Wyatt A, Ladner D, Schulte-Körne G. Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2003;86(3):169–193
  45. Zoccolotti P, De Luca M, Di Pace E, Judica A, Orlandi M, Spinelli D. Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics. 1999;20(2):191–216
  46. Zoccolotti P, de Luca M, di Pace E, Gasperini F, Judica A, Spinelli D. Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language. 2005;93(3):369–373
  47. Zoccolotti P, De Luca M, Judica A, Spinelli D. Isolating global and specific factors in developmental dyslexia: A study based on the rate and amount model (RAM). Experimental Brain Research. 2008;186(4):551–560

PII: S0010-9452(10)00177-2

doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.005

Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 10 , Pages 1259-1271 , November 2010