Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 9 , Pages 1199-1203 , October 2010

Surround modulation of neuronal responses in V1 is as stable over time as responses to direct stimulation of receptive fields

  • Sergiu P. Paşca

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
    • Center for Cognitive and Neural Studies (Coneural), Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • ,
  • Wolf Singer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
    • Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
  • ,
  • Danko Nikolić

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
    • Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Deutschordenstraße 46, D-60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Received 24 November 2009 ,Revised 28 April 2010 ,Accepted 13 May 2010.

References 

  1. Bair W, Cavanaugh JR, Movshon JA. Time course and time–distance relationship for surround suppression in macaque V1 neurons. Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;23:7690–7701
  2. Crist RE, Li W, Gilbert CD. Learning to see: Experience and attention in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 2001;4:519–525
  3. DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD, Ohzawa I. Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat’s primary visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1994;71:347–374
  4. Field DJ, Hayes A, Hess RF. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field”. Vision Research. 1993;33:173–193
  5. Fitzpatrick D. Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2000;10:438–443
  6. Gilbert CD. Adult cortical dynamics. Physiological Reviews. 1998;78:467–485
  7. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London). 1962;160:106–154
  8. Kastner S, Nothdurft HC, Pigarev IN. Neuronal correlates of pop-out in cat striate cortex. Vision Research. 1997;37:371–376
  9. Knierim JJ, Van Essen DC. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1992;67:961–980
  10. Levitt JB, Lund JS. Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex. Nature. 1997;387:73–76
  11. Li Z. Contextual influences in V1 as a basis for pop out and asymmetry in visual search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 1999;96:10530–10535
  12. Mureşan RC, Jurjuţ OF, Moca VV, Singer W, Nikolić D. The Oscillation Score: An efficient method for estimating oscillation strength in neuronal activity. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2008;99:1333–1353
  13. Nikolić D. Non-parametric detection of temporal order across pairwise measurements of time delays. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 2007;22:5–19
  14. Nothdurft HC, Gallant JL, Van Essen DC. Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of “popout” under anesthesia. Vision Neuroscience. 1990;16:15–34
  15. Schneider G, Havenith MN, Nikolić D. Spatiotemporal structure in large neuronal networks detected from cross-correlation. Neural Computation. 2006;18:2387–2413
  16. Schneider G, Nikolić D. Detection and assessment of near-zero delays in neuronal spiking activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2006;152:97–106
  17. Sengpiel F, Sen A, Blakemore C. Characteristics of surround inhibition in cat area 17. Experimental Brain Research. 1997;116:216–228
  18. Series P, Lorenceau J, Fregnac Y. The “silent” surround of V1 receptive fields: Theory and experiments. Journal of Physiology (Paris). 2003;97:453–474

PII: S0010-9452(10)00149-8

doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.05.003

Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 9 , Pages 1199-1203 , October 2010