Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 9 , Pages 1178-1188, October 2010

Right posterior cortical functions in a tumour patient series

  • Tim Shallice

      Affiliations

    • Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA-ISAS, Trieste, Italy
    • Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA-ISAS, Via Bonomea 256, 34136 Trieste, Italy.
  • ,
  • Alessandro Mussoni

      Affiliations

    • Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA-ISAS, Trieste, Italy
  • ,
  • Serena D’Agostino

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuroradiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
  • ,
  • Miran Skrap

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy

Received 22 September 2009; received in revised form 31 October 2009 and 1 March 2010; accepted 17 March 2010. published online 10 June 2010.

Action editors Marco Catani and Dominic ffytche

Abstract 

It is standardly believed that the localisation of cognitive function by means of impairments arising from cortical tumour is not possible as the functional defects that result are mild and unspecific. These assumptions were not supported in an investigation of four processes generally sensitive to right posterior cortical lesions, when patients with parieto-occipital lesions were compared with prefrontal ones. In three of the tests loading on the individual processes – Reaching Accuracy, Star Cancellation, Fragmented Letters and Cube Analysis – parieto-occipital impairments were found in the basic groups analysis and this was so in the right-hemisphere group. More critically, in these tests Lesion Behaviour Mapping showed the critical lesion site for the tests to have relatively little overlap with those of the other tests, indicating that the cognitive effects were not widespread and diffuse. In addition, in three of the tests the critical lesion sites fitted localisations arrived from other procedures. Patients with high-grade tumours performed considerably worse than those with low-grade tumours in only two of the tests (Star Cancellation, Cube Analysis) particularly in the right parieto-occipital group. In three (Reaching Accuracy, Star Cancellation, Cube Analysis) there was a deterioration with the operation specifically in the low-grade tumour patients. It is suggested that a tumour patient series may provide converging evidence for the localisation of a function initially obtained by some other procedure.

Keywords: Cerebral tumour, Parieto-occipital, Optic ataxia, Neglect, Local processing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-9452(10)00128-0

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.04.005

Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 9 , Pages 1178-1188, October 2010