Cortex
Volume 47, Issue 3 , Pages 332-341 , March 2011

Object affordance and spatial-compatibility effects in Parkinson's disease

  • Adam Galpin

      Affiliations

    • Directorate of Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, University of Salford, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Directorate of Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UK.
    • ,
  • Steven P. Tipper

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, Bangor University, Gwynedd, UK
    • ,
  • Jeremy P.R. Dick

      Affiliations

    • Greater Manchester Neurosciences Unit, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK
    • ,
  • Ellen Poliakoff

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK

Received 5 October 2009 ,Revised 17 December 2009 ,Accepted 20 January 2010.

References 

  1. Acosta E, Simon JR. The effect of irrelevant information on the stages of processing. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1976;8:181–187
  2. Anderson SJ, Yamagishi N, Karavia V. Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2002;269:1225–1232
  3. Boccardi E, Della Salla S, Motto C, Spinnler H. Utilisation behaviour consequent to bilateral SMA softening. Cortex. 1999;38:289–308
  4. Brown RG, Jahanshahi M, Marsden D. Response choice in Parkinson's disease: The effects of uncertainty and stimulus–response compatibility. Brain. 1993;116:869–885
  5. Castiello U, Ansuini C, Bulgheroni M, Scaravilli T, Nicoletti R. Visuomotor priming effects in Parkinson's disease patients depend on the match between the observed and the executed action. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:835–842
  6. Cope MT, Georgiou N, Bradshaw JL, Iansek R, Phillips JG. Simon effect and attention in Parkinson's disease: A comparison with huntington's disease and tourette's syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 1996;18:276–290
  7. Delaney HD, Maxwell SE. On using analysis of covariance in repeated measures designs. Multivariate Behavioural Research. 1981;16:105–128
  8. Ellis R, Tucker M. Micro-affordance: The potentiation of actions by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology. 2000;91:451–471
  9. Fahn S, Elton RG. Members of the UPDRS development committee: Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. In:  Fahn S,  Marsden CD,  Calne DB,  Goldstein M editor. Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease. Florham Park (NJ): Macmillan Healthcare Information; 1987;p. 153–163
  10. Fielding J, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Bradshaw J, Millist L, White O. No sequence dependent modulation of the Simon effect in Parkinson's disease. Cognitive Brain Research. 2005;25:251–260
  11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975;12:189–198
  12. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1979;
  13. Glickstein M, Stein J. Paradoxical movement in Parkinson's disease. Trends in Neurosciences. 1991;14:480–482
  14. Grèzes J, Decety J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:212–222
  15. Grèzes J, Armony J, Rowe J, Passingham R. Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurons in the human brain: An fMRI study. NeuroImage. 2003;18:928–937
  16. Grèzes J, Tucker M, Armony J, Ellis R, Passingham R. Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;17:2735
  17. Hammond N, Barber P. Evidence for abstract response codes: Ear-hand correspondence effect in a three choice reaction-time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1978;30:71–82
  18. Jahanshahi M, Jenkins H, Brown RG, Marsden CD, Passingham RE, Brooks DJ. Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with pet and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's diseases subjects. Brain. 1995;118:913–933
  19. Kritikos A, Leahy C, Bradshaw JL, Iansek R, Phillips JG, Bradshaw JA. Contingent and non-contingent auditory cueing in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33:1193–1203
  20. Majsak MJ, Kaminski T, Gentile AM, Flanagan JR. The reaching movements of patients with Parkinson's disease under self-determined maximal speed and visually cued conditions. Brain. 1998;121:755–766
  21. Nachev P, Kennard C, Hussain M. Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary areas. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2008;9:856–869
  22. Nelson HE. National Adult Reading Test (NART). London: NFER-Nelson; 1991;
  23. Nicoletti R, Umilta C. Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychological Research. 1994;56:144–150
  24. Nieuwboer A, Vercruysse S, Feys P, Levin O, Spildooren J, Swinnen S. Upper limb movement interruptions are correlated to freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:1422–1430
  25. Oliveira RM, Gurd JM, Nixon P, Marshall JC, Passingham RE. Micrographia in Parkinson's disease: The effect of providing external cues. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 1997;63:429–433
  26. Phillips JC, Ward R. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition. 2002;9:540–558
  27. Poliakoff E, Galpin A, Dick J, Moore P, Tipper SP. The effect of viewing graspable objects and actions in Parkinson's disease. NeuroReport. 2007;18:483–487
  28. Poliakoff E, O'Boyle DJ, Moore AP, McGlone FP, Cody FWJ, Spence C. Orienting of attention and Parkinson's disease: Tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition. Brain. 2003;126:2081–2092
  29. Praamstra P, Plat FM. Failed suppression of direct visuomotor activation in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2001;13:31–43
  30. Raven JC. Guide to Using the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale with the Progressive Matrices Scales. London: HK Lewis and Co. Ltd; 1958;
  31. Redgrave P, Prescott TJ, Gurney K. The basal ganglia: A vertebrate solution to the selection problem?. Neuroscience. 1999;89:1009–1023
  32. Rubichi S, Nicoletti R, Iani C, Umilta C. The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1997;23:1353–1364
  33. Rubinstein TC, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. The power of cueing to circumvent dopamine deficits: A review of physical therapy treatment of gait disturbances in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders. 2002;17:1148–1160
  34. Simon JR, Acosta E. Effect of irrelevant information on the processing or relevant information: Facilitation and/or interference? The influence of experimental design. Perception & Psychophysics. 1982;31:383–388
  35. Simon JR, Acosta E, Mewaldt SP, Speidel CR. The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics. 1976;19:16–22
  36. Simon JR, Small AM. Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1969;53:433–435
  37. Symes E, Ellis R, Tucker M. Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition. 2005;12:1337–1361
  38. Symes E, Ellis R, Tucker M. Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica. 2007;124:238–255
  39. Tipper SP, Paul MA, Hayes AE. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2006;13:493–498
  40. Tucker M, Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1998;24:830–846
  41. Tucker M, Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition. 2001;8:769–800
  42. Van Selst M, Jolicoeur P. A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1994;47:631–650
  43. Vingerhoets G, Vandamme K, Vercammen A. Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances. Brain and Cognition. 2009;69:481–489
  44. Wallace RJ. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971;88:354–360
  45. Wittfoth M, Buck D, Fahle M, Herrmanna M. Comparison of two Simon tasks: Neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception. NeuroImage. 2006;32:921–929
  46. Wylie SA, Stout JC, Bashore TR. Activation of conflicting responses in Parkinson's disease: Evidence for degrading and facilitating effects on response time. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43:1033–1043
  47. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1983;17:37–49

PII: S0010-9452(10)00055-9

doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.011

Cortex
Volume 47, Issue 3 , Pages 332-341 , March 2011

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution