Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Object affordance and spatial-compatibility effects in Parkinson's disease

Adam GalpinaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Steven P. Tipperb, Jeremy P.R. Dickc, Ellen Poliakoffd

Received 5 October 2009; received in revised form 27 November 2009 and 17 December 2009; accepted 20 January 2010. published online 02 March 2010.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Movement in Parkinson's disease (PD) is strongly influenced by sensory stimuli. Here, we investigated two features of visual stimuli known to affect response times in healthy individuals; the spatial location of an object (the spatial effect) and its action-relevance (the ‘affordance’ effect). Poliakoff et al. (2007) found that while PD patients show normal spatial effects, they do not show an additional affordance effect. Here we investigated whether these effects are driven by facilitation or inhibition, and whether the affordance effect emerges over a longer time-course in PD. Participants (24 PD and 24 controls) viewed either a lateralised door handle (affordance condition), a lateralised abstract stimulus (spatial condition), or a centrally presented baseline stimulus (baseline condition), and responded to a colour change in the stimulus occurring after 0msec, 500msec or 1000msec. The colour change indicated whether to respond with the left or right hand, which were either spatially compatible or incompatible with the lateralised stimulus orientation in the affordance and spatial conditions. The baseline condition allowed us to assess whether compatibility effects were driven by facilitation of the compatible response or inhibition of the incompatible response. The results indicate that stimulus orientation elicited faster responses from the nearest hand. For controls, the affordance effect was stronger and driven by facilitation, whilst the spatial condition was driven by inhibition. In contrast, the affordance and spatial-compatibility effects did not differ between conditions in the PD group and both were driven by facilitation. This suggests that the PD group responded as if all stimuli were action-relevant, and may have implications for understanding the cueing of movement in PD.

Action editor Georg Goldenberg

a Directorate of Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, University of Salford, Salford, UK

b School of Psychology, Bangor University, Gwynedd, UK

c Greater Manchester Neurosciences Unit, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK

d School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Directorate of Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UK.

PII: S0010-9452(10)00055-9

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.011