Cortex
Volume 47, Issue 2 , Pages 217-235, February 2011

Phonological–lexical activation: A lexical component or an output buffer? Evidence from aphasic errors

  • Cristina Romani

      Affiliations

    • Aston University, Birmingham, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, England, UK.
  • ,
  • Claudia Galluzzi

      Affiliations

    • University of Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • Andrew Olson

      Affiliations

    • Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy

Received 1 July 2008; received in revised form 16 October 2008 and 19 January 2009; accepted 29 October 2009. published online 17 February 2010.

Action editor Dr Myrna Schwartz

Abstract 

Single word production requires that phoneme activation is maintained while articulatory conversion is taking place. Word serial recall, connected speech and non-word production (repetition and spelling) are all assumed to involve a phonological output buffer. A crucial question is whether the same memory resources are also involved in single word production. We investigate this question by assessing length and positional effects in the single word repetition and reading of six aphasic patients. We expect a damaged buffer to result in error rates per phoneme which increase with word length and in position effects. Although our patients had trouble with phoneme activation (they made mainly errors of phoneme selection), they did not show the effects expected from a buffer impairment. These results show that phoneme activation cannot be automatically equated with a buffer. We hypothesize that the phonemes of existing words are kept active though permanent links to the word node. Thus, the sustained activation needed for their articulation will come from the lexicon and will have different characteristics from the activation needed for the short-term retention of an unbound set of units. We conclude that there is no need and no evidence for a phonological buffer in single word production.

Keywords: Aphasia, Phonological output buffer, Phonological errors, Buffer impairment, Length effects, Positional effects

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-9452(09)00322-0

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.004

Cortex
Volume 47, Issue 2 , Pages 217-235, February 2011