Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 4 , Pages 550-563 , April 2010

The influence of age and individual differences in executive function on stimulus processing in the oddball task

  • Robert West

      Affiliations

    • Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. W112 Lagomarcino Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
  • ,
  • Hillary Schwarb

      Affiliations

    • Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • ,
  • Brandy N. Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

Received 25 November 2008 ,Revised 26 April 2009 ,Accepted 3 August 2009.

References 

  1. Barcelo F, Periañaz JA, Knight RT. Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty. NeuroReport. 2002;13:1887–1892
  2. Brink TL, Yesavage JA, Lum O, Heersema P, Adey M, Rose TL. Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clinical Gerontologist. 1982;1:37–44
  3. Buckner RL. Three principles for cognitive aging research: Multiple causes and sequelae, variance in expression and response, and the need for integrative theory. In:  Cabeza R,  Nyberg N,  Park D editor. Cognitive Neuroscience of Aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005;p. 267–285
  4. Cabeza R, Anderson ND, Locantore JK, McIntosh AR. Aging gracefully: Compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. NeuroImage. 2002;17:1394–1402
  5. Daffner KR, Ryan KK, Williams DM, Budson AE, Rentz DM, Scinto LFM, et al. Age-related differences in novelty and target processing among cognitively high performing adults. Neurobiology of Aging. 2005;26:1283–1295
  6. Davis SW, Dennis NA, Daselaar SM, Fleck MS, Cabeza R. Que PASA? The posterior–anterior shift in aging. Cerebral Cortex. 2008;18:1201–1209
  7. Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E. Parsing the late positive complex: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology. 2004;41:665–678
  8. Donchin E, Coles MGH. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1988;11:357–374
  9. Duncan-Johnson CC. P300 latency: A new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology. 1981;18:207–215
  10. Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E. The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biological Psychology. 1982;14:1–52
  11. Eimer M. Attending to quadrants and ring-shaped regions: ERP effects of visual attention in different spatial selection task. Psychophysiology. 1999;36:491–503
  12. Fabiani M, Friedman D. Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: The novelty oddball. Psychophysiology. 1995;32:579–594
  13. Fabiani M, Friedman D, Cheng J. Individual differences in P3 scalp distribution in older adults, and their relationship to frontal lobe function. Psychophysiology. 1998;35:698–708
  14. Fabiani M, Low KA, Wee E, Sable JJ, Gratton G. Reduced suppression or labile memory? Mechanisms of inefficient filtering of irrelevant information in older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;184:637–650
  15. Ford JM, Pfefferbaum A. Event-related potentials and eyeblink responses in automatic and controlled processing: Effects of age. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1991;78:361–377
  16. Friedman D, Hamberger M, Ritter W. Event-related potentials as indicators of repetition priming in young and elderly adults: Amplitude, duration and scalp distribution. Psychology and Aging. 1993;8:120–125
  17. Friedman D, Kazmerski VA, Cycowicz YM. Effects of aging on the novelty P3 during attend and ignore oddball tasks. Psychophysiology. 1998;35:508–520
  18. Friedman D, Kazmerski V, Fabiani M. An overview of age-related changes in the scalp distribution of P3b. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1997;104:498–513
  19. Friedman D, Simpson G, Hamberger M. Age-related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. Psychophysiology. 1993;30:383–396
  20. Glisky EL, Polster MR, Routhieaux BC. Double dissociation between item and source memory. Neuropsychology. 1995;9:229–235
  21. Gorsuch RL. Factor Analysis. 2nd ed.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1983;
  22. Grady CL, Maisog JM, Horwitz B, Ungerleider LG, Mentis MJ, Salerno JA, et al. Age-related changes in cortical blood flow activation during visual processing of faces and location. Journal of Neuroscience. 1994;14:1450–1462
  23. Heaton RK. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1981;
  24. Hopfinger JB, Luck SJ, Hillyard SA. Selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuromagnetic studies. In:  Gazzaniga MS editors. The Cognitive Neurosciences. vol. 3:Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004;p. 561–574
  25. Hillyard SA, Münte TF. Selective attention to color and location cues: An analysis with event-related brain potentials. Perception and Psychophysics. 1984;36:185–198
  26. Huynh H, Feldt LS. Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics. 1976;1:69–82
  27. Johnson R. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology. 1986;23:367–384
  28. Katayama J, Polich J. Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology. 1998;35:23–33
  29. Kray J, Eppinger B, Mecklinger A. Age differences in attentional control: An event-related potential approach. Psychophysiology. 2005;42:407–416
  30. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology. 2001;38:557–577
  31. Lobaugh NJ, West R, McIntosh AR. Spatiotemporal analysis of experimental differences in event-related potential data with partial least squares. Psychophysiology. 2001;38:517–530
  32. Mangun GR, Hillyard SA. Mechanisms and models of selective attention. In:  Rugg MD,  Coles MGH editor. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-related Brain Potentials and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995;p. 40–85
  33. McDaniel MA, Glisky EL, Guynn MJ, Routhieaux BC. Prospective memory: A neuropsychological study. Neuropsychology. 1999;13:103–110
  34. McDowd JM, Filion DL. Aging, selective attention, and inhibitory processes: A psychophysiological approach. Psychology and Aging. 1992;7:65–71
  35. McIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, Haxby JV, Grady CL. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. NeuroImage. 1996;3:143–157
  36. McIntosh AR, Lobaugh NJ. Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: Applications and advances. NeuroImage. 2004;23:S250–S263
  37. Nielsen-Bohlman L, Knight RT. Prefrontal alterations during memory processing in aging. Cerebral Cortex. 1995;5:541–549
  38. Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Wenegrat BG, Roth WT, Kopell BS. Clinical application of the P3 component of the ERP I: Normal aging. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1984;59:85–103
  39. Picton TW, Stuss DT, Champagne SC, Nelson RF. The effects of age on human event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 1984;21:312–325
  40. Polich J. Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies. Psychophysiology. 1996;33:334–353
  41. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Cappell K. Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2008;17:177–182
  42. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Lustig C. Brain aging: Reorganizing discoveries about the aging mind. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2005;15:245–251
  43. Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan HG, Macht M. Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. Science. 1982;218:909–911
  44. Rule RR, Shimamura AP, Knight RT. Orbitofrontal cortex and dynamic filtering of emotional stimuli. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2002;2:264–270
  45. Strayer DL, Wickens CD, Braune R. Adult age differences in the speed and capacity of information processing: 2. An electrophysiological approach. Psychology and Aging. 1987;2:99–110
  46. Verleger R, Neukater W, Kompf D, Vieregge P. On the reasons for the delay of P3 latency in healthy elderly subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1991;79:488–502
  47. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Hartcourt Brace Janovich; 1981;
  48. West R. The effects of aging on controlled attention and conflict processing in the stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:103–113
  49. West R. The neural basis of age-related decline in prospective memory. In:  Cabeza R,  Nyberg N,  Park D editor. Cognitive Neuroscience of Aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005;p. 246–264
  50. West R, Moore K. Adjustments of cognitive control in younger and older adults. Cortex. 2005;41:570–581
  51. West R, Schwarb H. The influence of aging and frontal function on the neural correlates of regulative and evaluative aspects of cognitive control. Neuropsychology. 2006;20:468–481
  52. West R, Travers S. Differential effects of aging on processes underlying task switching. Brain and Cognition. 2008;68:67–80
  53. West RL. An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin. 1996;120:272–292
  54. Yamaguchi S, Knight RT. Age effects on the P300 to novel somatosensory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1991;78:297–301

PII: S0010-9452(09)00243-3

doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.001

Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 4 , Pages 550-563 , April 2010