Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 8 , Pages 965-981, September 2010

Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect

  • Thomas Busigny

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education (PSP), Unité de Cognition et Développement (CODE), Place du Cardinal Mercier, 10, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • ,
  • Bruno Rossion

Universite Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Received 22 October 2008; received in revised form 20 May 2009 and 6 July 2009; accepted 7 July 2009. published online 17 August 2009.

Action editor Paolo Bartolomeo

Abstract 

Individual faces are notoriously difficult to recognize when they are presented upside-down. Since acquired prosopagnosia (AP) has been associated with an impairment of expert face processes, a reduced or abolished face inversion effect (FIE) is expected in AP. However, previous studies have incongruently reported apparent normal effects of inversion, a decreased or abolished FIE, but also a surprisingly better performance for inverted faces for some patients. While these discrepant observations may be due to the variability of high-level processes impaired, a careful look at the literature rather suggests that the pattern of FIE in prosopagnosia has been obscured by a selection of patients with associated low-level defects and general visual recognition impairments, as well as trade-offs between accuracy and correct RT measures. Here we conducted an extensive investigation of upright and inverted face processing in a well-characterized case of face-selective AP, PS (Rossion et al., 2003). In 4 individual face discrimination experiments, PS did not present any inversion effect at all, taking into account all dependent measures of performance. However, she showed a small inversion cost for individualizing members of a category of non-face objects (cars), just like normal observers. A fifth experiment with personally familiar faces to recognize confirmed the lack of inversion effect for PS. Following the present report and a survey of the literature, we conclude that the FIE is generally absent, or at least clearly reduced following AP. We also suggest that the paradoxical superior performance for inverted faces observed in rare cases may be due to additional upper visual field defects rather than to high-level competing visual processes. These observations are entirely compatible with the view that AP is associated with a disruption of a process that is also abolished following inversion: the holistic representation of individual exemplars of the face class.

Keywords: Prosopagnosia, Face inversion effect (FIE), Holistic face processing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-9452(09)00215-9

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.004

Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 8 , Pages 965-981, September 2010