Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 10 , Pages 1217-1228, November 2009

A different outlook on time: Visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete

  • Michelle Jarick

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Mike J. Dixon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.
  • ,
  • Mark T. Stewart

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Willamette University, Oregon, USA
  • ,
  • Emily C. Maxwell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Willamette University, Oregon, USA
  • ,
  • Daniel Smilek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Received 9 July 2008; received in revised form 11 December 2008 and 27 January 2009; accepted 26 May 2009. published online 10 August 2009.

Abstract 

Synaesthesia is a fascinating condition whereby individuals report extraordinary experiences when presented with ordinary stimuli. Here we examined an individual (L) who experiences time units (i.e., months of the year and hours of the day) as occupying specific spatial locations (January is 30° to the left of midline). This form of time-space synaesthesia has been recently investigated by Smilek et al. (2007) who demonstrated that synaesthetic time-space associations are highly consistent, occur regardless of intention, and can direct spatial attention. We extended this work by showing that for the synaesthete L, her time-space vantage point changes depending on whether the time units are seen or heard. For example, when L sees the word JANUARY, she reports experiencing January on her left side, however when she hears the word “January” she experiences the month on her right side. L's subjective reports were validated using a spatial cueing paradigm. The names of months were centrally presented followed by targets on the left or right. L was faster at detecting targets in validly cued locations relative to invalidly cued locations both for visually presented cues (January orients attention to the left) and for aurally presented cues (January orients attention to the right). We replicated this difference in visual and aural cueing effects using hour of the day. Our findings support previous research showing that time-space synaesthesia can bias visual spatial attention, and further suggest that for this synaesthete, time-space associations differ depending on whether they are visually or aurally induced.

Keywords: Synaesthesia, Time-space associations, Visual attention, Spatial cueing, Spatial forms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-9452(09)00210-X

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.05.014

Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 10 , Pages 1217-1228, November 2009