Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 5 , Pages 685-690, May 2010

Lucky numbers: Spatial neglect affects physical, but not representational, choices in a Lotto task

  • Tobias Loetscher

      Affiliations

    • School of Behavioural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia
    • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Behavioural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010 Melbourne, Australia.
  • ,
  • Michael E.R. Nicholls

      Affiliations

    • School of Behavioural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • John N. Towse

      Affiliations

    • Psychology Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
  • ,
  • John L. Bradshaw

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Australia
  • ,
  • Peter Brugger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Received 30 January 2009; received in revised form 7 April 2009 and 18 May 2009; accepted 29 June 2009. published online 27 July 2009.

Action editor Giuseppe Vallar

Abstract 

Spatial neglect can be characterized by a “magnetic attraction” towards the right side of a visual stimulus array and a selection of stimuli from that hemispace. This study examined whether these distinctive characteristics in visuo-motor space are also evident in representational number space. Given that numbers are thought to be represented along a left-to-right oriented mental number line, an affinity for the spontaneous selection of larger numbers was anticipated for neglect patients. Contrary to this expectation, neglect patients (n=20) picked a similar range of numbers compared to controls (n=17) when generating a number between 1000 and 10 000 and when playing an imaginary lottery game. There was, however, a positive correlation between the biases for the imaginary lottery, number generation and a number bisection task – demonstrating that exploration asymmetries along the mental number line are consistent within individuals across tasks. Some of the patients selected smaller numbers in all of these tasks, confirming reports of dissociations between physical and numerical-representational forms of neglect. Conversely, only four (20%) of the patients could reliably be classified as demonstrating a neglect in number space. When filling out a physical lottery ticket, the neglect patients showed the expected bias towards picking numbers placed on the right-hand side of the ticket. These results demonstrate that the magnetic attraction towards the right side of mental representations is rather weak and that representational forms of neglect only occasionally co-exist with neglect in physical space.

Keywords: Space representation, Representational neglect, Spatial attention, Mental number line, Numerical cognition

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-9452(09)00206-8

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.010

Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 5 , Pages 685-690, May 2010