Journal Home
Search for

Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 595-601 (May 2010)


View previous. 6 of 18 View next.

‘Normal’ semantic–phonemic fluency discrepancy in Alzheimer's disease? A meta-analytic study

Keith R. LawsaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Amy Duncana, Tim M. Galeab

Received 10 October 2008; received in revised form 30 March 2009 and 3 April 2009; accepted 13 April 2009. published online 29 June 2009.

Abstract 

In a meta-analysis of 135 studies involving 6000 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 6057 healthy controls, we examined the relative degree of semantic and phonemic fluency impairment in AD patients. The effect size for semantic fluency (d=2.10: 95%CI 2.22–1.97) was significantly larger than for both phonemic fluency (d=1.46: 95%CI 1.56–1.36) and picture naming (d=1.54: 95%CI 1.66–1.40). In meta-regression analyses we found that studies with greater proportions of female patients and less severe dementia both led to better phonemic fluency; while perhaps surprisingly, increased patient education led to worse semantic fluency. Critically, in 50 studies measuring both semantic and phonemic fluency, the effect size for the semantic–phonemic discrepancy scores did not differ between AD patients and controls; and was unrelated to any of the moderator variables. The latter findings indicate that the semantic–phonemic fluency discrepancy measure often reported as an important distinguishing characteristic of AD patients may be an exaggerated normal tendency.

Action editor John Crawford

a School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, UK

b Department of Psychiatry, QEII Hospital, HPFT, Welwyn Garden City, UK

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK.

PII: S0010-9452(09)00148-8

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.009


View previous. 6 of 18 View next.