Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 2 , Pages 242-255 , February 2010

Visual processing in pure alexia: A case study

  • Randi Starrfelt

      Affiliations

    • Center for Visual Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Center for Visual Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Linnesgade 22, 1361 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
    • ,
  • Thomas Habekost

      Affiliations

    • Center for Visual Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
    • ,
  • Christian Gerlach

      Affiliations

    • Learning Lab Denmark, University of Aarhus, Denmark

Received 30 June 2008 ,Revised 20 March 2009 ,Accepted 27 March 2009.

References 

  1. Anderson SW, Damasio AR, Damasio H. Troubled letters but not numbers. Domain specific cognitive impairments following focal damage in frontal cortex. Brain. 1990;113:749–766
  2. Behrmann M, Black SE, Bub D. The evolution of pure alexia: a longitudinal study of recovery. Brain and Language. 1990;39:425–427
  3. Behrmann M, Nelson J, Sekuler EB. Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: “Pure” alexia is not pure. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36:1115–1132
  4. Behrmann M, Plaut DC, Nelson J. A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1998;15:7–51
  5. Behrmann M, Shomstein SS, Black SE, Barton JJ. The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and nonreading tasks. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39:983–1002
  6. Bergenholtz H. Dansk frekvens ordbog. Copenhagen, DK: G.E.C. Gads Forlag; 1992;
  7. Binder JR, Mohr JP. Topography of callosal reading pathways. Brain. 1992;115:1807–1826
  8. Bowers JS, Bub DN, Arguin M. A characterisation of the word superiority effect in a case of letter-by-letter surface alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1996;13:415–441
  9. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review. 1990;97:523–547
  10. Bundesen C, Habekost T, Kyllingsbaek S. A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review. 2005;112:291–328
  11. Cohen L, Dehaene S. Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area. NeuroImage. 2004;22:466–476
  12. Cohen L, Martinaud O, Lemer C, Lehericy S, Samson Y, Obadia M, et al. Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: Anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cerebral Cortex. 2003;13:1313–1333
  13. Cohen L, Henry C, Dehaene S, Martinaud O, Lehericy S, Lemer C, et al. The pathophysiology of letter-by-letter reading. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:1768–1780
  14. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1196–1208
  15. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. SINGLIMS.EXE (Computer Software). Scotland, UK: University of Aberdeen; 2002;
  16. Cumming TB, Patterson K, Verfaille MM, Graham KS. One bird with two stones: Abnormal word length effects in pure alexia and semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2006;23:1130–1161
  17. Damasio AR, Damasio H. The anatomic basis of pure alexia. Neurology. 1983;33:1573–1583
  18. Duncan J, Bundesen C, Olson A, Humphreys G, Chavda S, Shibuya H. Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1999;128:450–478
  19. Duncan J, Bundesen C, Olson A, Humphreys G, Ward R, Kyllingsbaek S, et al. Attentional functions in dorsal and ventral simultanagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2003;20:675–701
  20. Farah MJ. Visual Agnosia. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1990;
  21. Farah MJ. Visual Agnosia. 2nd ed.. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004;
  22. Fiset D, Gosselin F, Blais C, Arguin M. Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:1466–1476
  23. Gade A, Udesen H, Mortensen EL. Visual closure. Street Completion Test. Nordisk Psykologi. 1988;40:194–201
  24. Gaillard R, Naccache L, Pinel P, Clemenceau S, Volle E, Hasboun D, et al. Direct intracranial, fMRI, and lesion evidence for the causal role of left inferotemporal cortex in reading. Neuron. 2006;50:191–204
  25. Gerlach C. Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39:895–900
  26. Gerlach C, Aaside CT, Humphreys GW, Gade A, Paulson OB, Law I. Brain activity related to integrative processes in visual object recognition: Bottom-up integration and the modulatory influence of stored knowledge. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1254–1267
  27. Gerlach C, Marstrand L, Habekost T, Gade A. A case of impaired shape integration: Implications for models of visual object processing. Visual Cognition. 2005;12:1409–1443
  28. Gerlach C, Law I, Paulson OB. Shape configuration and category-specificity. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:1247–1260
  29. Habekost T, Bundesen C. Patient assessment based on a theory of visual attention (TVA): Subtle deficits after a right frontal-subcortical lesion. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:1171–1188
  30. Habekost T, Rostrup E. Persisting asymmetries of vision after right side lesions. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:876–895
  31. Habekost T, Starrfelt R. Alexia and quadrant-amblyopia: Reading disability after a minor visual field deficit. Neuropsychologia. 2006;22:2465–2476
  32. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, Barker P, Herskovits E, Degaoncar M. The roles of the “visual word form area” in reading. NeuroImage. 2005;24:548–559
  33. Kasten E, Gothe J, Bunzenthal U, Sabel BA. Kampimetrische Untersuhung visueller Funktionen am Computermonitor. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 1999;207:97–118
  34. Kasten E, Wüst S, Behrens-Baumaan W, Sabel BA. Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Nature Medicine. 1998;4:1083–1087
  35. Kay J, Hanley R. Simultaneous form perception and serial letter recognition in a case of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1991;8:249–273
  36. Kay J, Lesser R, Coltheart M. Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992;Danish edition: Lønnberg C and Hallas-Møller G. Psykolingvistisk Undersøgelse af Sprogprocessering hos Afasiramte. Copenhagen, DK: Center for Rehabilitation of Brain Injury, 2005.
  37. Kinsbourne M, Warrington EK. A disorder of simultaneous form perception. Brain. 1962;85:461–486
  38. Kyllingsbaek S. Modeling visual attention. Behavior Research Methods. 2006;38:123–133
  39. Leff AP, Crewes H, Plant GT, Scott SK, Kennard C, Wise RJ. The functional anatomy of single-word reading in patients with hemianopic and pure alexia. Brain. 2001;124:510–521
  40. Leff AP, Spitsyna G, Plant GT, Wise RJS. Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2006;77:1004–1007
  41. Lloyd-Jones TJ, Humphreys GW. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory and Cognition. 1997;25:18–35
  42. McClelland JL, Johnston JC. The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords. Perception and Psychophysics. 1977;22:249–262
  43. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97–113
  44. Price CJ, Devlin JT. The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage. 2003;19:473–481
  45. Price CJ, Devlin JT. The pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: “The visual word form area”. NeuroImage. 2004;22:477–479
  46. Price CJ, Humphreys GW. Letter-by-letter reading? Functional deficits and compensatory strategies. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1992;9:427–457
  47. Rayner K, Bertera JH. Reading without a fovea. Science. 1979;206:468–469
  48. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Brunn JL. A prelexical basis for letter-by-letter reading: a case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1990;7:1–20
  49. Sekuler EB, Behrmann M. Perceptual cues in pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1996;13:941–974
  50. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 1980;6:174–215
  51. Sørensen TA. Visual short-term memory: Is capacity dependent on stimulus complexity? (Abstract). In Proceedings of the XVth Meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology. 2007: 99–100.
  52. Starrfelt R. Selective alexia and agraphia sparing numbers: A case study. Brain and Language. 2007;102:52–63
  53. Starrfelt R, Gerlach C. The visual what for area: Words and pictures in the left fusiform gyrus. NeuroImage. 2007;35:334–342
  54. Warrington EK, Shallice T. Word-form dyslexia. Brain. 1980;103:99–112

PII: S0010-9452(09)00117-8

doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.013

Cortex
Volume 46, Issue 2 , Pages 242-255 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution