Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 5 , Pages 650-661, May 2009

The bi-pedal ape: Plasticity and asymmetry in footedness

  • David P. Carey

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen AB24 2UB, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • Daniel T. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Present address: Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham, Queens Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • Douglas Martin

      Affiliations

    • Present address: Division of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • Geoff Smith

      Affiliations

    • Present address: Australians Donate, Suite 2, Level 2, 20-22 Albert Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3204, Australia.
  • ,
  • Jan Skriver

      Affiliations

    • Present address: Senior Associate, Resilience, 74122 Knivsta, Sweden.
  • ,
  • Adam Rutland

      Affiliations

    • Present address: Department of Psychology, Keynes College, The University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury CT2 7NP, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • John W. Shepherd

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom

Received 17 April 2007; received in revised form 18 May 2007 and 21 December 2007; accepted 14 May 2008. published online 15 December 2008.

Action editor Jordan Grafman

Abstract 

A strong preference for using the right foot for skilled activities parallels a similar side bias for hand use. However, many neuropsychologists, sports scientists and sports commentators argue that right-foot bias in soccer is reduced or even eliminated by practice. This sort of plasticity is an important component of the principle genetic theories of handedness, yet very little is known about the relative asymmetries in the many unipedal skills required in soccer at amateur or professional levels. The first study examined self-report of hand and foot bias in a sample (n=400) of amateur soccer players, in addition to information about their practice with the non-preferred foot. A second study quantified foot use on the pitch in a large sample (n=426) of professional soccer players. The majority of the amateurs reported a right-foot bias that is very similar to that seen in the general population (≈80%). However they only endorse strong biases for “closed” (self-paced) soccer actions like penalty and other free kicks, which give players unlimited time and space for preparation and execution. Although there was a very slight tendency for less right-foot bias in the professionals (≈75%), as assessed by actual foot use rather than questionnaire, few players show anything like what could be described as two-footed play. This bias, unlike in the reports of amateurs, were for all of the behaviours investigated, not just so-called “skilled” behaviours. Finally, when outcomes of preferred and non-preferred foot behaviours were contrasted, the professionals were remarkably adept on those rare occasions when they use their non-preferred foot, suggesting that skill cannot explain asymmetry of choice. These results are discussed in terms of 1) limitations of self-report on questionnaires for predicting actual on the field behaviour, 2) the surprising absence of plasticity in foot use, given the importance of learning, experience and culture in models of handedness and footedness, and 3) a left hemisphere lateralised intentional system as important for the selection of movements as for their execution.

Keywords: Asymmetry, Left hemisphere, Footedness, Motor control, Soccer, Football

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-9452(08)00258-X

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.011

Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 5 , Pages 650-661, May 2009