Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 10 , Pages 1148-1155, November 2009

Is the human primary motor cortex activated by muscular or direction-dependent features of observed movements?

  • Kaat Alaerts
  • ,
  • Stephan P. Swinnen
  • ,
  • Nicole Wenderoth

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Motor Control Laboratory, Division of Movement Control and Neuroplasticity, Department of Biomedical Kinesiology, Group Biomedical Sciences, Katholieke Universtiteit Leuven, Belgium, Tervuursevest 101, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.

Motor Control Laboratory, Division of Movement Control and Neuroplasticity, Department of Biomedical Kinesiology, Group Biomedical Sciences, Katholieke Universtiteit Leuven, Belgium

Received 2 April 2008; received in revised form 31 July 2008 and 16 September 2008; accepted 29 October 2008. published online 22 December 2008.

Action editor David Carey

Abstract 

Previous Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies have shown that the observer's motor system is facilitated by the sole observation of motor actions. However, it has not been possible so far to decide whether the observer's motor system resonates primarily with the observed movement direction or the observed muscle activity, as both factors usually co-varied in these action observation studies. Here, we applied TMS to the wrist extensor and flexor during the observation of wrist motions such that the posture of the observer and the model in the video were either congruent or incongruent. Due to this manipulation, it was possible to disentangle whether the observer's primary motor cortex (M1) is facilitated in accordance to either the observed movement direction or the observed muscle activation. Findings revealed that M1 resonated predominantly according to muscle-specific rather than direction-specific parameters of observed movements. More specifically, muscle-specific facilitation was maximal during congruent postures and remained evident, even though to a lower extent, during incongruent postures in which muscle activation and movement direction parameters were discordant. Our findings support the hypothesis that M1 contributes to action observation, by representing the observed movement in intrinsic, muscle-related coordinates. This transformation from extrinsic to intrinsic coordinates might be an important prerequisite for action understanding and imitation. Additionally, our data offer a neurophysiological explanation for interference that emerges when an action is performed while an incongruent action is observed.

Keywords: Mirror neurons, Action observation, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Primary motor cortex, Movement interference

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-9452(08)00252-9

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.005

Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 10 , Pages 1148-1155, November 2009