Cortex
Volume 44, Issue 9 , Pages 1265-1270, October 2008

Repeat and Point: Differentiating semantic dementia from progressive non-fluent aphasia

  • John R. Hodges

      Affiliations

    • Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
    • Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.
  • ,
  • Marina Martinos

      Affiliations

    • Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • Anna M. Woollams

      Affiliations

    • Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • Karalyn Patterson

      Affiliations

    • Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • Anna-Lynne R. Adlam

      Affiliations

    • Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK

Received 17 January 2007; received in revised form 29 May 2007 and 28 June 2007; accepted 31 August 2007. published online 14 February 2008.

Action editor Ria De Bleser

Abstract 

To determine whether a new, simple, quick measure, the Repeat and Point test, reliably differentiates between semantic dementia (SD) and progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA).

Fifteen patients with SD, six patients with PNFA and 18 healthy controls were administered the Repeat and Point test. Participants were required to repeat 10 multi-syllabic concrete nouns and, following each repetition, to point to the word's pictorial referent amongst an array of six semantically and perceptually similar foils.

Patients with SD were consistently impaired relative to PNFA patients and controls on the comprehension (pointing) component of the task, whereas patients with PNFA showed no significant deficit on pointing but were impaired at the production (repeating) component. Discriminant function analysis confirmed perfect classification of the individual patients into their respective groups: criteria involving a ratio of the two scores are provided.

The Repeat and Point test is particularly appropriate for routine use in a clinical context: it is quick and easy to administer and score; it reliably discriminated between the two patient groups, SD and PNFA; and it offers a simple rule of thumb, i.e., the Repeat-to-Point ratio, to aid in the diagnosis of these two language variants of frontotemporal dementia (FTD).

Keywords: Semantic dementia, Progressive non-fluent aphasia, Frontotemporal dementia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure: the authors have reported no conflicts of interest.

PII: S0010-9452(07)00155-4

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.018

Cortex
Volume 44, Issue 9 , Pages 1265-1270, October 2008