Cortex
Volume 44, Issue 9 , Pages 1161-1170, October 2008

Does sex influence the age of acquisition of common names? A contrast of different semantic categories

  • Riccardo Barbarotto

      Affiliations

    • Neuropsychology Unit, Centro S. Ambrogio', Fatebenefratelli, Cernusco s/n, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Marcella Laiacona

      Affiliations

    • S. Maugeri Foundation, Veruno Scientific Institute, Aphasia Unit, Veruno, Italy
  • ,
  • Erminio Capitani

      Affiliations

    • Milan University, Neurology Unit, S. Paolo Hospital, Milano, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Milan University, Neurology Unit, S. Paolo Hospital, via Di Rudini 8, 20142 Milano, Italy.

Received 29 March 2007; received in revised form 10 July 2007; accepted 2 August 2007. published online 31 January 2008.

Action editor Gus Buchtel

Abstract 

The literature reports a sex-related asymmetry in the ability to process different semantic categories: women are more proficient with biological categories and men with man-made objects. The origin of this asymmetry is still debated. In this study, we directly checked whether the acquisition of names belonging to different semantic categories differs according to sex. We carried out our inquiry on 202 children aged 3–5 years, who were given a coloured picture naming task using a battery of 60 stimuli belonging to different semantic categories. Boys differed from girls only on naming of stimuli belonging to the categories of tools and vehicles, where they showed an earlier name acquisition. No sex differences were found for animals or plant life, notwithstanding evidence in the literature of an overrepresentation of males among patients affected by biological categories impairment.

Our findings suggest that the male advantage for tools and vehicles reported in the literature on verbal fluency and naming tasks is strongly related to the earlier age in males of name acquisition for these categories, and possibly to their higher familiarity. On the contrary, the female advantage for plant life knowledge, which becomes evident later in life, has a still undefined nature and only a dubious relationship to familiarity, although it is sufficient to cause an overrepresentation of males among patients affected by a category specific impairment of biological categories, especially of plant life knowledge.

Keywords: Semantic categories, Age of acquisition, Sex differences

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0010-9452(07)00135-9

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.016

Cortex
Volume 44, Issue 9 , Pages 1161-1170, October 2008