Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 5 , Pages 619-629 , May 2009

The “Haunt” project: An attempt to build a “haunted” room by manipulating complex electromagnetic fields and infrasound

  • Christopher C. French

      Affiliations

    • Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK.
  • ,
  • Usman Haque

      Affiliations

    • Haque Design+Research, UK
  • ,
  • Rosie Bunton-Stasyshyn

      Affiliations

    • Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, London, UK
  • ,
  • Rob Davis

      Affiliations

    • Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, London, UK

Received 26 November 2006 ,Revised 24 September 2007 ,Accepted 2 October 2007.

References 

  1. Baker RA, Nickell J. Missing Pieces: How to Investigate Ghosts, UFOs, Psychics, and Other Mysteries. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus; 1992;
  2. Blackmore S. Psychic experiences: psychic illusions. Skeptical Inquirer. 1992;16:367–376
  3. Braithwaite JJ. Magnetic variances associated with ‘haunt-type’ experiences: a comparison using time-synchronised baseline measurements. European Journal of Parapsychology. 2004;19:3–28
  4. Braithwaite JJ, Perez-Aquino K, Townsend M. In search of magnetic anomalies associated with haunt-type experiences: pulses and patterns in dual time-synchronised measurements. Journal of Parapsychology. 2004;68:255–288
  5. Braithwaite JJ, Townsend M. Research note: sleeping with the entity – a quantitative magnetic investigation of an English castle's reputedly ‘haunted’ bedroom. European Journal of Parapsychology. 2005;20:65–78
  6. Braithwaite JJ, Townsend M. Good vibrations: the case for a specific effect of infrasound in instances of anomalous experience has yet to be empirically demonstrated. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. 2006;70:211–224
  7. Bressan P. The connection between random sequences, everyday coincidences, and belief in the paranormal. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2002;16:17–34
  8. Brugger P, Dowdy MA, Graves RE. From superstitious behavior to delusional thinking: the role of the hippocampus in misattributions of causality. Medical Hypotheses. 1994;43:397–402
  9. Brugger P, Regard M, Landis T, Cook N, Krebs D, Niederberger J. ‘Meaningful’ patterns in visual noise: effects of lateral stimulation and the observer's belief in ESP. Psychopathology. 1993;26:261–265
  10. Brugger P, Regard M, Landis T, Graves RE. The roots of meaningful coincidence. The Lancet. 1995;345:1306–1307
  11. Christopher M. Seers, Psychics and ESP. London: Cassell; 1971;
  12. Cook CM, Persinger MA. Experimental induction of the “sensed presence” in normal subjects and an exceptional subject. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1997;85:683–693
  13. Cook CM, Persinger MA. Geophysical variables and behaviour: XCII. Experimental elicitation of the experience of a sentient being by right hemispheric, weak magnetic fields: interaction with temporal lobe sensitivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2001;85:683–693
  14. Dubal S and Viaud-Delmon I. Schizotypy and subjective perception of normal environmental sounds. Cortex, submitted for publication.
  15. French CC, Santomauro J. Something wicked this way comes: Causes and interpretations of sleep paralysis. In:  Della Sala S editors. Tall Tales: Popular Myths about the Mind and Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007;[chapter 23]
  16. Gearheart L, Persinger MA. Geophysical variables behaviour: XXXIII. Onsets of contemporary and historical poltergeist episodes occurred with sudden increases in geomagnetic activity. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1986;62:463–466
  17. Granqvist P, Fredrikson M, Unge P, Hagenfeldt A, Valind S, Larhammar D, et al. Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak complex magnetic fields. Neuroscience Letters. 2005;375:69–74
  18. Houran J, Brugger P. The need for independent control sites: a methodological suggestion with special reference to haunting and poltergeist field research. European Journal of Parapsychology. 2000;15:30–45
  19. Houran J, Lange R. Diary of events in a thoroughly unhaunted house. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1996;83:499–502
  20. Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press; 1987;
  21. Lange R, Houran J. Context-induced paranormal experiences: support for Houran and Lange's model of haunting phenomena. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1997;84:1455–1458
  22. Lange R, Houran J, Harte TM, Havens RA. Contextual mediation of perceptions in hauntings and poltergeist-like experiences. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1996;82:755–762
  23. Larsson M, Larhammer D, Fredrikson M, Granqvist P. Reply to M.A. Persinger and S.A. Koren's response to Granqvist et al. “Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak complex magnetic fields”. Neuroscience Letters. 2005;380:348–350
  24. Linney YM, Peters ER, Ayton P. Reasoning biases in delusion-prone individuals. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1998;37:285–302
  25. Maher MC. Quantitative investigation of the General Wayne Inn. Journal of Parapsychology. 2000;63:47–80
  26. Makarec K, Persinger MA. Electroencephalographic validation of a temporal lobe signs inventory. Journal of Research in Personality. 1990;24:323–337
  27. McCue P. Theories of hauntings: a critical overview. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. 2002;66:1–21
  28. Mohr C, Leonards U. Does contextual information influence positive and negative schizotypy scores in healthy individuals? The answer is maybe. Psychiatry Research. 2005;136:135–141
  29. MORI paranormal survey. Available from: 1998;http://www.mori.com/polls/1998/s980205.shtml[accessed 04.10.05]
  30. Morris R. Review of the Amityville Horror. Skeptical Inquirer. 1977–1978;2:95–102
  31. Musella DP. Gallup poll shows that Americans' belief in the paranormal persists. Skeptical Inquirer. 2005;29:5
  32. Nichols A, Roll WG. Discovery of electromagnetic anomalies at two reputedly haunted castles in Scandinavia. In: Proceedings of Presented Papers: the Parapsychological Association 42nd Annual Convention; 1999. p. 219–36.
  33. Persinger MA. Geophysical variables and behaviour: XXII. The tectonogenic strain continuum of unusual events. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1985;60:59–65
  34. Persinger MA. The neuropsychiatry of paranormal experiences. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2001;13:515–524
  35. Persinger MA, Cameron RA. Are earth faults at fault in some poltergeist-like episodes?. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. 1986;61:49–73
  36. Persinger MA, Koren SA. Predicting the characteristics of haunt phenomena from geomagnetic factors and brain sensitivity. In:  Houran J,  Lange R editor. Hauntings and Poltergeists: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.; 2001;[chapter 8]
  37. Persinger MA, Koren SA. A response to Granqvist et al. “Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak complex magnetic fields”. Neuroscience Letters. 2005;380:346–347
  38. Persinger MA, Koren SA, O'Connor RP. Geophysical variables and behaviour: CIV. Power-frequency magnetic field transients (5microtesla) and reports of haunt experiences within an electronically dense house. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2001;93:673–674
  39. Persinger MA, Tiller SG, Koren SA. Experimental simulation of a haunt experience and elicitation of paroxysmal electroencephalographic activity by transcerebral complex magnetic fields: induction of a synthetic “ghost”?. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2000;90:659–674
  40. Randi J. The Columbus poltergeist case. Part I: flying phones, photos, and fakery. Skeptical Inquirer. 1984–1985;10:221–235
  41. Roll WG, Persinger MA. Investigations of poltergeists and haunts: a review and interpretation. In:  Houran J,  Lange R editor. Hauntings and Poltergeists: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.; 2001;[chapter 6]
  42. Rutkowski CA. Geophysical variables and behaviour: XVI. Some criticisms. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1984;58:480–482
  43. Sellen JL, Oaksford MO, Gray NS. Schizotypy and conditional reasoning. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2005;31:105–116
  44. Shaner A. Delusions, superstitious conditioning and chaotic dopamine neurodynamics. Medical Hypotheses. 1999;52:119–123
  45. Tandy V. Something in the cellar. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. 2000;64:129–140
  46. Tandy V, Lawrence TR. The ghost in the machine. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. 1998;62:360–364
  47. Thalbourne MA. Further studies of the measurement and correlates of belief in the paranormal. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. 1995;89:233–247
  48. Thalbourne MA. The level of paranormal belief and experience among psychotics. Journal of Parapsychology. 1998;62:79–81
  49. Thalbourne MA, Delin PS. A new instrument for measuring the sheep–goat variable: its psychometric properties and factor structure. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. 1993;59:172–186
  50. Tsakanikos E, Reed P. Do positive schizotypal symptoms predict false perceptual experiences in non-clinical population?. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2005;193:809–812
  51. Tsakanikos E, Reed P. Seeing words that are not there: detection biases in psychometric schizotypy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2005;44:295–299
  52. Wackermann J, Pütz P, Allefeld C. Ganzfeld-induced hallucinatory experience, its phenomenology and cerebral electrophysiology. Cortex. 2008;44:1364–1378
  53. Warman DM, Lysaker PH, Martin JM, Davis L, Haudenschield SL. Jumping to conclusions and the continuum of delusional belief. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2007;45:1255–1269
  54. Wilkinson HP, Gauld A. Geomagnetism and anomalous experiences, 1868–1980. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research. 1993;57:275–310
  55. Wilson K, French CC. The relationship between susceptibility to false memories, dissociativity, and paranormal belief and experience. Personality and Individual Differences. 2006;41:1493–1502
  56. Wiseman R, Watt C, Greening E, Stevens P, O'Keeffe C. An investigation into the alleged haunting of Hampton Court Palace: psychological variables and magnetic fields. Journal of Parapsychology. 2002;66:388–408
  57. Wiseman R, Watt C, Stevens P, Greening E, O'Keeffe C. An investigation into alleged ‘hauntings’. British Journal of Psychology. 2003;94:195–211

PII: S0010-9452(08)00129-9

doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.10.011

Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 5 , Pages 619-629 , May 2009